• Home
  • Posts
  • About

ZIONIST PUPPETS

March 28, 2022 By J. Michael Springmann

Meet the militantly pro-Israel Trump official directing the economic war on Iran - The Grayzone

Sigal Pearl Mandelker

This article first appeared in the American Herald Tribune, a publication twice shut down by the U.S. government.

Puppets? There are puppets in the theater and there are puppets in politics. Here is one tale of a Zionist puppet in the U.S. government. Where she came from, we know. Where she is now, we know. How she got there, we don’t know. Did she have a godfather, did she have a rabbi, did she have a puppet master? We don’t know. What we do know is that she moved very quickly and very smoothly through very sensitive areas in the American government.

Sigal Pearl Mandelker is currently Undersecretary of the U.S. Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence. This position oversees, inter alia, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). OFAC places sanctions on organizations and individuals.  FinCEN has access to the U.S. National Security Agency’s Signals Intelligence Network (i.e., they read other peoples’ mail, be it email, faxes, telephone calls, or use of communications apps such as Signal or Telegram). Although confirmed by the American Senate on June 21, 2017, Mandelker was born and grew up in Israel.

When and how she came to America, we don’t know. Possibly, it was the result of marriage to Steven D. Capozzola, once connected to the right-wing Breitbart organization.

Career track. After law school at the University of Pennsylvania, Mandelker became a law clerk to conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. After that, and a clerkship with Judge Edith Jones of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, she moved to national security positions at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. Department of Justice. Prior to her confirmation as Undersecretary, she was a partner at the law firm of Proskauer Rose LLP, with a personal income of more than $1 million per annum.

But, let’s focus on the Treasury job.  The first office head of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence (OTFI), created during the George W. Bush administration, was Stuart Levey, followed by David Cohen, succeeded by Adam Szubin, and now Sigal P. Mandelker. Those names are not Buddhist names nor are they good Muslim names.

However, Philip Giraldi, former CIA counterterrorism officer, pegged them as Israeli operatives. He noted that Levey worked secretly with the Apartheid Entity’s government and its cats-paws in the U.S., such as AIPAC (American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee) and the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD). Giraldi went on to say that Cohen and other OTFI counterterrorism job holders were both Jews and Zionists. Giraldi added that Adam Szubin, who took the position in 2015, was replaced by Mandelker in 2017.  Conceivably, Giraldi commented, Mandelker could still be an Israeli citizen. (“Israel’s Fifth Column: Exercising Control From Inside the Government.” If Americans Knew Blog.)

Giraldi went on to say that OTFI heads like Mandelker have targeted individuals and organizations that Israel and its American lobbyists have deemed enemies.  One example might be the New Horizon Conference, which, during the past 6 years, brought together government officials, journalists, politicians, activists, and thinkers from abroad for meetings with Iranian politicians, clerics, and reporters.

According to a knowledgeable D.C. attorney, Mandelker is hard at work on imposing sanctions and is deeply involved with the efforts of people and organizations seeking to free themselves from such restrictions.

We drew a blank. In an effort to clarify Mandelker’s background, the author called a number of Zionist organizations and asked them to help fill in the gaps in the Undersecretary’s history. For example, how did she get to the United States and move so quickly through its government?  Moreover, this writer was curious about her statements at the May 2017 Senate confirmation hearings and asked about them. Before the banking committee, Mandelker went into great detail about how her parents, before they migrated to Israel, had endured great hardship hiding from the Nazis, and how they inculcated their values into her in Israel. However, she said little about her own qualifications for the position, other than recounting the list of her previous jobs.

This correspondent dialed AIPAC, which didn’t return his message. He telephoned the Anti-Defamation League and B’nai Brith, to no avail. When he rang up the FDD, Toby Dershowitz, their government affairs contact, told him Mandelker was doing a great job and she didn’t know or care what her ethnic origin was.

Digging deeper, this writer emailed the Israeli embassy in Washington, D.C., and asked if an Israeli would lose his citizenship if he became an American citizen. The embassy did not reply. Then, the author emailed the Israeli Foreign Ministry with the same question. Again, there was no response.

In exasperation, this correspondent filed a complaint with the Treasury Department’s Inspector General. He noted Mandelker’s Israeli citizenship, her strong support of Zionist policy, and questioned her loyalty to the United States. In particular, this writer emphasized her lies about the New Horizon Conference: that it was anti-Semitic (with Arabs and Jews in attendance); that it denied the Holocaust (which it didn’t); and that it recruited spies for Iranian intelligence (no one approached this writer). No answer has been forthcoming.

What are they hiding? Simple. The Undersecretary’s godfathers, her rabbis, her puppet masters! She, like many dual-national, dual loyalty Zionists, has been carefully picked and carefully groomed and carefully placed in positions of great influence by Israel and Israeli agents.

God is said to protect fools, drunkards, and the United States of America. However, given Zionists of Influence, He has His hands full.

  1. Michael Springmann is a former U.S. State Department official having served as a diplomat in the Foreign Service with postings in Germany, India, and Saudi Arabia. He previously authored, Visas for Al Qaeda: CIA Handouts That Rocked the World: An Insider’s View recounting his experiences observing officials granting travel visas to unqualified individuals. Additionally, he penned Goodbye, Europe? Hello, Chaos?  Merkel’s Migrant Bomb, an analysis of the alien wave sweeping the Continent. He currently practices law in the Washington D.C. Area.

Filed Under: Culture Clash, Freedom of Speech, Immigration, Iran, Israel, Sanctions, Terrorism, Zionism Tagged With: Iran, Israel, politics, US Government, Zionists

CIVILITY? NOT AT THE AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS ASSOCIATION!

January 20, 2022 By J. Michael Springmann

Huh?  The Fantasy.  The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) has a civility code.  AILA – AILA Civility Code).  Inter alia, it states:

  1. I will conduct myself in a professional and civil manner at all times when engaged in AILA-related activities and communications, including treating AILA members, staff, and the public with civility.
  2. I will not use language that is demeaning, abusive, or hostile…
  3. I will not knowingly misrepresent, mischaracterize, or misquote information in seeking to advance any point of view….

Intervention The AILA Membership Committee reserves the right to intervene in response to violations of The Rules both sua sponte and following a complaint. Complaints may be filed by any AILA member or staff member and will be handled with low-range or high-range interventions, depending on the location and nature of the violation…

The Reality.  1.  On 19 December 2021, I filed a civility complaint with AILA against Ava Benach, a local Washington, D.C. attorney.  Ava, for unknown reasons, took umbrage at my questioning the requirement that applicants for Legal Permanent Residence are now required to be “vaccinated” against Covid-19—while the staggering number of illegal aliens President Joe Biden has let loose in the U.S. are not.  (104,000 illegals—who were caught in 2021—were given notices to appear before an immigration field office.  Of that number, 48,000 have disappeared.  More than 54,000 others ignored the requirement to report to Immigration and Customs Enforcement.  (Illegal aliens vanish after being released into US — RT World News).

Ava Benach–File Photo

Benach, in writing to the 800 member AILA Washington, D.C. Listserve about me, said on 12 October 2021:

 I cannot believe that I am having this conversation on an AILA listserve.  I cannot understand how anyone practicing immigration law can call people “illegals” and make such an idiotic remark as if people at the border are not subject to grounds of inadmissibility.

I don’t know what your practice is like but I can tell that you barely tolerate a wide portion of immigrants and I hope that you retire or find a new line of work before too long. 

Perhaps I am biased, but I certainly believe the foregoing remarks are:  unprofessional, uncivil, demeaning, abusive or hostile.  Just like the AILA Civility Code says.

Furthermore, in an effort to misrepresent, mischaracterize, and misquote information in seeking to advance any point of view, just like the Code says, Benach broadcast to the 800 members on the Washington, D.C. AILA Listseve:

I find that when I have tricky legal issues on immigration issues, I consult these books:

https://www.amazon.com/s?i=stripbooks&rh=p_27%3AJ.+Michael+Springmann&s=relevancerank&text=J.+Michael+Springmann&ref=dp_byline_sr_book_1

The quoted link connects to my two books on the American government’s creation of Islamic terrorism (Visas for aal Qaeda:  CIA Handouts That Rocked the World and the origin and channeling of the migrant wave that struck Europe in 2015, Goodbye, Europe?  Hello, Chaos?  Merkel’s Migrant Bomb).

  1. Simultaneously, I also complained about another AILA member: Margaret Stock (Lt. Col., USA, ret’d), an immigration attorney in Alaska.  She wrote to the 800 member AILA DC Listserve (which I, unfortunately, must quote nearly in full):

Margaret Stock–File Photo

I was curious about Mr. Springmann’s blog, so I read it.  

 In the blog, Mr. Springmann pitches books he wrote on immigration policy as his source for answering questions about US immigration law. That is a “turnoff” because the book titles indicate that they aren’t useful for a US immigration law practitioner.  He then complains in the blog that nobody has answered his questions on the AILA DC listserve.  After seeing this particular complaint, I looked at the two questions that he posted in the time that I’ve been a chapter member. They are not questions that I would have answered, and it’s not because I’m engaged in any conspiracy to ignore them. 

 Rather . . . The questions convey the impression that Mr. Springmann is unfamiliar with basic US immigration law, as well as the practicalities of practicing law generally. I felt that if I answered the questions, I was going to be taking on the task of being an ongoing mentor to an attorney who is unfamiliar with basic immigration law.  Answering the questions and the inevitable follow up would be time consuming.

 Example #1: Mr. Springmann complains that he wasn’t allowed into a Federal building with an expired ID.  Well, the client’s appointment notice says an attorney can appear by telephone.  I don’t think AILA as an organization can assist a member who chooses to attend an appointment in person and who lets his ID expire and can’t get into a Federal building as a result.   What would one post to the listserve to help him here? Should we tell Mr. Springmann to read his clients’ I797s and follow the instructions? Or bring a different ID next time?

 Example #2. Mr. Springmann complains that USCIS interviewed his client for an appointment without completing background check or biometrics first, per hearsay from the clients (he wasn’t allowed into the building because his ID had expired, so he doesn’t know what happened at the interview except based on what his clients told him).  Well, if Mr. Springmann filed the case, he should know whether his client had biometrics done. Mr. Springmann would have been copied with the biometrics notice.  Mr. Springmann asks “how to get USCIS moving.” The question is so vague that I wouldn’t have answered it. “Get moving on what”? 

 Example #3: Mr. Springmann posted a detailed and complicated fact situation that indicated multiple problematical but basic immigration law problems with a case, and then asked “would appreciate advice, counsel, and USCIS contacts.”  But the detailed case summary indicated that Mr. Springmann is unfamiliar with immigration law and how it works (among other things, he expressed concern that his clients wanted him to contact USCIS about a “via extension” [visa extension?] when he had told the clients to “contact airline” . . .). The client’s I797s contain info on how to contact USCIS. All one has to do is read them.  I would not know how to help an attorney who thinks contacting an airline, rather than USCIS, will get a visa extended.

 Respectfully . . . Most AILA members aren’t going to answer questions that show the questioner isn’t at all familiar with the basics of immigration law.   There’s no conspiracy there, and it’s not “bullying,” it’s just that we are all quite busy taking care of our own clients and have limited time to mentor other attorneys on the basics of immigration law…

 Unprofessional, uncivil, demeaning, abusive or hostile?  An effort to misrepresent, mischaracterize, and misquote information in seeking to advance any point of view? 

I sure think so, but then, maybe I’m biased.  Being an attorney, author, political commentator, and former diplomat obviously has imbued me with a different outlook than most.  But then, being from Alaska, perhaps Miss Stock didn’t know that, because of the virus, Washington, D.C. took an entire year to renew my driver’s license and couldn’t understand that the same expired ID had gotten me into the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Merrifield, Virginia office for an adjustment of status interview.  Regarding her Example 2, she apparently did not realize I “attended” the hearing in Norfolk, Va. by cell phone from the parking lot.

And rebutting every incorrect point Lt. Col. Stock made would cause the Reader to stop reading out of sheer boredom.

The Unsurprising Result.  Ava Benach’s website trumpets close connections with AILA’s leadership and the things her firm has done for the organization.  (Ava Benach – Benach Collopy, llp).  I do not know the connection between Benach and Stock, living as they do at opposite ends of the country, but Stock seems to parrot and build on Benach’s idiocy.  However, the retired military policeman wouldn’t write such things if they weren’t close.  More interestingly, the Internet describes Lt. Col. Stock as a politician involved with national security issues, having been a professor at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point.  (Stock also ran unsuccessfully for the U.S. Senate Margaret Stock for U.S. Senate – Are You In? (margaretforalaska.com)

AILA’s resolution of my grievance is as follows, regrettably in its full verbosity.  Please note that the organization suggests I work on MY civility.  Also see that AILA wants me to keep the matter “confidential”, as most questionable organizations do when they’re involved in bias and prejudice.

Mr. Springmann,

On behalf of the AILA National Membership Committee, I am following up on your Civility Code complaint against Margaret Stock and Ava Benach regarding messages sent to the AILA DC Chapter listserv between October 12 and December 2, 2021.

The Membership Committee determined that Ms. Stock and Ms. Benach did not violate the Civility Code.

Further, after reviewing the full history and record, we encourage you to review AILA’s mission: to promote justice, advocate for fair and reasonable immigration law and policy, advance the quality of immigration and nationality law and practice, and enhance the professional development of its members. In addition, the Civility Code emphasizes the importance of promoting and fostering a professional and civil environment. Your use of the word “illegals” does not advance the mission of AILA, nor does it promote and foster a professional and civil environment. There are a number of resources available that explain further why that term is considered to be uncivil as well as suitable replacements. One such example can be found via the link below.

https://www.raceforward.org/sites/default/files/DTIW_Stylebook.pdf  [Remarkable “woke” nonsense]

Going forward, please conduct yourself in a professional and civil manner at all times when engaged in AILA-related activities and communications, and refrain from disseminating communications that contain unprofessional language.

If you are not satisfied with the answers you receive from volunteer members of your chapter listserv, AILA maintains a mentor program. You can find more information about this program at https://www.aila.org/mentor-directory.

The Membership Committee requests that you do not disseminate the result of your complaint as all remedies are considered confidential under the Civility Code.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Russell Abrutyn
Chair, AILA National Membership Committee

The AILA membership committee staff involved in this goat-roping were:

Russell Abrutyn, Chair
Palma Yanni, Vice Chair
Cindy Azoulay
Tiffany Martinez
Maggie M. Murphy
Sheela Murthy
John L. Pinnix
Ari J. Sauer
Jacqueline Watson
Alexis Axelrad, ExCom Liaison

Speculation for Hostility Against Me.  While I have remarked on the mysterious reasons for Ava Benach’s invidious comments, it’s worth taking a look at Margaret Stock’s wild, libelous remarks.  My books, Visas for Al Qaeda and Goodbye, Europe, castigate, in some detail, Lt. Col. Stock’s personal beliefs and associations.  Notably, in them, I hammer the corrupt, incompetent, illegitimate, and racist U.S. government, including its Army and Congress, for which Stock, mandatorily-retired soldier, was a failed candidate.  Moreover, as a political commentator, I have spoken out against U.S. national security policy, dear to Stock’s heart, on several Russian television stations, such as BaltNews, NTV, Russia One; as well as Al-Araby (Qatar); Al-Mayadeen TV (Beirut); and PressTV (Tehran).

Ultimately, I will not renew my membership in the highly-politicized immigration lawyers’ association.  Not because, as Groucho Marx said: I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member. , but because, as he commented, Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies.

 

Filed Under: attorneys, Censorship, Freedom of Speech, Immigration Tagged With: civility, lawyers

AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS ASSOCIATION: A MODEL FOR HATE—A MODEL FOR NON-COOPERATION

December 12, 2021 By J. Michael Springmann

According to its website, the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA):  is the national association of immigration lawyers established to promote justice, advocate for fair and reasonable immigration law and policy, advance the quality of immigration and nationality law and practice, and enhance the professional development of its members.

Oh, My!  In October 2021, I commented on a question I saw on AILA’s ListServe for the Washington, D.C. area.  I said I was appalled that Applicants for Permanent Legal Residence had to be vaxxed while tens of thousands of illegal aliens were pouring across the borders, unvaxxed and likely bearing covid.

Here are some responses to my statement:

Ava Benach:  … I cannot understand how anyone practicing immigration law can call people “illegals” and make such an idiotic remark as if people at the border are not subject to grounds of inadmissibility.  I don’t know what your practice is like but I can tell that you barely tolerate a wide portion of immigrants and I hope that you retire or find a new line of work before too long.

Ana Zigel:  Really Mr. Springman – you dare make this comment.  I guess you get your “facts” from Fox News.  This statement is outrageous and not becoming of an immigration lawyer.  I agree with Ava – I think it’s time you find a new line of work.

To be sure, some sensible attorneys defended me and cited immigration law and U.S. Supreme Court decisions.  And they made eminent sense.

However, … Afterwards, I found when I asked for help with two questions posed to me by clients, I got no real responses from the ListServe, except for Ava Benach’s post:  I find that when I have tricky legal issues on immigration issues, I consult these books:

https://www.amazon.com/s?i=stripbooks&rh=p_27%3AJ.+Michael+Springmann&s=relevancerank&text=J.+Michael+Springmann&ref=dp_byline_sr_book_  (Link to my books on the sources of Islamic terrorism and the migrant wave rolling over Europe.)

A second post of the same questions got no results, not even from AILA’s management, to whom I had sent copies.  The foregoing emails I received were examples of harassment, bullying, and incivility–all forbidden by AILA’s ethics code.

Backlisted?  It is not unreasonable to assume that the various attacks on me may have been orchestrated by Ava Benach.  Given Benach’s position at AILA, it would not be unreasonable to imagine that Ava has, in some way, gotten the organization to ensure that no one will respond to any of my questions on behalf of my clients.  And my job as attorney is to promote and protect their interests.

Ava, shown above, displays claims on the firm’s website about receiving …the Edith B. Lowenstein Award for Excellence in Advancing the Practice of Immigration Law by the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA)… Ava currently serves on the Amicus Committee of the AILA helping to set nationwide litigation strategy for the organization…Ava served as Chair of the Litigation Committee and as Pro Bono Coordinator….

What’s Not Being Done.  AILA appears to be more concerned with virtue signaling and refusing to enforce its ethics code.  Moreover, the Association will not use its resources to sue the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) for failing to do its job.

USCIS is delaying approval of simple applications.  I have people who have been waiting two years for Adjustment of Status to Legal Permanent Resident.  Without explanation.  This used to be accomplished within six months from date of application.  Others, asylum applicants with a credible objective and subjective fear of persecution, have been waiting for half a dozen years.

What’s AILA doing about this?  Not a thing to the best of my knowledge.  I even asked the ListServe about USCIS’ failure to do a background check on an Adjustment applicant—when that organization’s rentacop refused me admission with him to its Norfolk, Va. District Office. My Washington, D.C. driver’s license had expired—and could not possibly be renewed because of the virus.  I received no response from the ListServe.

My View.  AILA seems to be a very inbred, cliquish cult.  It is also like every large organization in today’s America–dysfunctional.  AILA ostensibly exists to make money from expensive membership dues and publications or other “advantages” of membership.  It seems to be filled with time-serving hacks who hate the people their jobs require them to serve.  This is often the result of overwork and underpay as well as boredom.  (Cf. Why Nothing Works; Marvin Harris).

The first step towards a logical solution to the issue is to clean house, adding to America’s unemployment level.  The second step is to provide real assistance and mentoring.  (I well remember the last time I belonged to AILA and asked questions.  The usual response was “Why are you requesting help?  You should know the answer.”)  The third step is for AILA to rigorously challenge USCIS for not fulfilling its mission—and not ask individual practitioners to sue for a court order commanding that the agency perform its duties—which costs the client a fortune in unreimbursable legal fees.

When I raised the foregoing problems with the Center for Immigration Studies, which bills itself as favoring low immigration while being pro-immigrant, the response was “Well, that’s AILA.”

 

 

Filed Under: Immigration Tagged With: AILA, USCIS

Submit a Story

Who’s Behind the Blog?

Recommended Reading

Wayne Madsen Report

World Affairs, globalresearch.ca

Video: Hausfrauleaks

Tags

911 AILA Angela Merkel civility CMT conflict Durable Medical Equipmentt economy Espionage europe Handicap Healthcare history intelligence Iran Iraq ISIS Israel J. Michael Springmann lawyers mass shootings Medicare Mercenaries Middle East migrants Mujahideen Osama bin Laden planned parenthood police politics Russia security Syed Farook Syria syrian refugees Tashfeen Malik U.S. Foreign Policy U.S. Intelligence UAE Ukraine US USCIS US Government war Zionists

Archives

  • August 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • November 2020
  • June 2019
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • May 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015

Copyright 2016 Haus Frau Leaks· designed by iWebResults